top of page

ABSTRACT

of the collection of essays and articles of B. V. Borissenko

“Do we have a future?”

          The philosophical and scientific rationale of the theory of spiritual evolution of the humankind on the base of a rich factual material is stated for the first time in the collection of essays and articles "Do we have a future?". The evolution of human civilization is considered as a derivative of the evolution of the spiritual state of a majority of people in every historical period of its development. The prevailing type of humans, in terms of their mental development as individuals, determines the level of the spiritual development of humankind and the stage at which the evolving Earth at the time is. It was established that the spiritual development of humanity is very conservative and its very slow speed is comparable to that of geological processes on the planet.

          The contemporary state of the planetary terrestrial evolution is identified as a state of biosphere that was named somosphere.

          The humankind is currently at the end of this stage of biosphere development of the planet, which is characterized by the interests of individuals, which underlie the entire hierarchy of the selfish nature of people from "me" to "nation".

          It is shown that the reactionary character and low efficiency of public administration systems, as well as that of religious, philosophical and scientific systems is determined exactly by the disregard of the phenomenon of enormous conservatism of the spiritual development of humans since their very inception on the planet.

          The conclusion about the need for adaptation of all the results of both scientific and unscientific forms of cognition of the world to the current level of spiritual evolution of humanity is made.

          From this point of view, the most promising formation model of the historical development of mankind currently is socially oriented capitalism as a set of relationships of capitals in the form of a socialitary state, the elite of which consists of people with different backgrounds: entrepreneurs and employees, scientists and clerics, artists and writers, composers and military..., as complimentary parts of society that do not oppose each other.

          Based on the nature of humans, it was found that there is a maximum possible limit in the solution of the problem of social justice for every level of the spiritual development of humankind (biosphere, somosphere, noosphere and hierosphere). Its value is determined on the base of the theory of quantity-to-quality transitions using the author's numerical method of qualitative analysis.

          To solve the problem of human survival, the need for people possessing encyclopedic knowledge to come to power is substantiated, which would correspond to the further evolution of the terrestrial biosphere from somosphere to noosphere. The noosphere will come naturally when, as a result of spiritual evolution of humankind, the balance of their interests becomes immanent for the selfish nature of every human. This is the perspective of the coming millennia.

          A new ethical teaching, successive from the major world religions of Christianity, Buddhism and Islam, is formulated in order to solve the problems connected to the ecosystem crisis on the planet.

          The transition from the right of nations to self-determination to the principle of the formation of nations is justified as a way to resolve multiple interethnic and military conflicts on the planet.

          Unlike in the Vedic, Christian and other belief systems based on the principle of catastrophism of the evolution of human civilization, a possibility of non-catastrophic steady progressive development of mankind is philosophically justified both for the present and the future.

CONTENTS

 

Chapter 1 THE HUMAN NATURE AND
                 THE IDEA OF SOCIAL JUSTICE..................................................................
1.1 Our current state...........................................................................................................
1.2 What people think of Marxism today...........................................................................
1.3 About the human nature - from Marxism to the human soul.......................................
1.4 Stages of the spiritual evolution of humankind...........................................................
1.5 Spiritual level of nations, people and mankind as a whole .........................................
1.6 What is a nation?..........................................................................................................
1.7 Formational approach to the evolution of society........................................................
1.8 The social system under which Soviet people lived....................................................
1.9 The connection between the formational approach to the evolution of society and

      the stages of spiritual evolution of humankind ...........................................................
Chapter 2 POWER.............................................................................................................
2.1 The tragedy of our people............................................................................................
2.2 Freedom, law, democracy............................................................................................
2.3 The rulers of our nation...............................................................................................
2.4 Change of principles of power structures formation during the transition from

      somosphere to noosphere ............................................................................................
Chapter 3 THE NATIONAL QUESTION.........................................................................
3.1 Relationships between nations.....................................................................................
3.2 The problem of “language”..........................................................................................
3.3 The disintegration of the USSR and the right of nations to self-determination, the

      hierarchy of national state structures...........................................................................
Chapter 4 ECONOMICS...................................................................................................
4.1 The law of conformity, the forms of ownership and the human nature.......................
4.2 Tax policy, inheritance laws and ways of transition to various forms of

      ownership.....................................................................................................................
4.3 Protection of the domestic market, foreign loan policy...............................................
4.4 Pricing policy...............................................................................................................
4.5 The large-scale factor in governing the country..........................................................
4.5.1 Dynamic economic system with movable territorial borders ..................................
4.5.2 The relationship of economic and electoral systems................................................
4.6 Economic development strategy and personnel policy................................................
Chapter 5 EDUCATION SYSTEM AND THE HUMAN NATURE................................
Chapter 6 HUMANITY AND NATURE...........................................................................
CONCLUSION..................................................................................................................
LIST OF REFERENCES (November 1990 ÷ February 1991)..........................................
ADDENDUM....................................................................................................................
Article prepared on the basis of the report on the XIX World Congress of Philosophers

      (August, 1993, Moscow (Russia) (basics of the theory of spiritual evolution of

      humankind) (April÷May 1993)...................................................................................
A letter to V. Fronin (March, 10÷12 1991)........................................................................
A letter to F. M. Burlatsky (September, 22÷23 1991).......................................................
A letter to D. A. Granin (September, 24÷25 1991)...........................................................
To the question of the place of religion (a letter to I. B. Eriomenko, September, 27

      1991)............................................................................................................................
A letter to I. M. Galitsky (about the physical foundations of the universe and society)
      (November, 8÷15 1992)...............................................................................................
A letter to V. I. Korogodin (about the evolution of life and mind on the planet)
      (November, 22÷23 1992).............................................................................................
About the ethical teaching (a letter to A. Rasbash, June 1998).........................................
To the question of the national idea (a letter to S. S. Govoruhin, March, 10÷22 2000)....
About the principle of the pormation of nations (an article “Russian-Japanese

      impasse”, May, 29 ÷ June, 6 2001)..............................................................................
On the issue of terrorism (a letter to P. Hlebnikov, September, 30 2001)..........................
On the need to develop a new ideology (a letter to A. N. Illarionov (January, 15÷16

      2002)............................................................................................................................
On the issue of national politics on the example of Russian-Japanese relations

      (an appeal to the Japanese embassy, March, 19 2002)................................................
From the appeal to the UN office in Kazakhstan (March, 19 2002)..................................
To the question of the ruling ones (a letter to A. V. Karaulov, April, 25 2002).................
On the global systemic crysis (May, 13 2002)...................................................................
A letter to S. P. Kapitsa (December, 4÷19 2005)...............................................................
An article “The problem of Kosovo” (March, 4÷6 2008).................................................
To the question of history as a branch of scientific knowledge (a letter to V. T.

      Tretyakov, March, 23 2008).........................................................................................
On the issue of climate change (August, 17-31 2010).......................................................

 

 
4  
4
5
7
9
12
14
15
18


20
21
21
24
26


28
30
30
32

33
38
38

41
46
47
49

49
59
51
52
59
61
63
67

 


67
76
77
80

 

83

85

 

93
107
117

 

134
145

 

148

152
154
155
158
160
164

 

168
171

 

 

(Click to reveal)

Note: this article is available only in Russian

The article has been sent to the specified E-Mail address.

Please specify your E-Mail address!

bottom of page